A fiery debate took center stage on GB News after 300 asylum seekers were placed in the Cresta Court Hotel in Altrincham, Manchester, sparking concerns among residents. The hotel, located near a primary school and an all-girls school, has led to a local outcry, with residents questioning the safety and vetting process for those newly arrived. The discussion quickly turned heated when panelist Alex Armstrong sharply criticized the “Refugee Welcome” protesters who had gathered in support of the asylum seekers.
Armstrong did not hold back, branding the protesters “morons” after one demonstrator described it as “racist to vet for pedophilia.” This statement triggered an intense reaction from Armstrong, who claimed, “Unbelievable. I think she represents the disgusting white liberal loser left that is destroying Britain.” He argued that vetting is necessary to ensure the safety of the local community and that it should not be dismissed as discriminatory. Armstrong’s remarks fueled a wider debate on the show about the role of vetting in immigration policies and the complexities of balancing compassion with security.
Throughout the segment, other panelists voiced mixed opinions. Some defended the vetting process as standard and essential for community safety, especially in cases where new arrivals are placed close to schools and family neighborhoods. One panelist pointed out, “When you apply for most jobs in the UK—whether as a teacher, care worker, or doctor—you undergo background checks. Vetting new arrivals should be no different. It’s about ensuring the safety of the community, not targeting any group unfairly.”
Others, however, argued that focusing too heavily on security could stigmatize those seeking asylum, many of whom have endured traumatic journeys. One commentator expressed, “There’s no denying the need for community safety, but we must remember that most of these individuals are here for a fresh start, fleeing dangerous conditions in their home countries. Let’s not make the mistake of labeling all asylum seekers as potential threats.”
The debate also touched on the government’s approach to handling the large volume of asylum seekers entering the UK, with critics highlighting the need for clearer immigration policies and efficient processing. They argued that the reliance on hotel accommodations for migrants reflects systemic issues, and the lack of community consultation in Altrincham was viewed by some as a failure of communication.
Armstrong and his fellow panelists reflected broader national concerns over immigration policies, particularly with regards to undocumented migrants arriving via the Channel. The debate highlighted the challenges the UK faces in balancing humanitarian responsibilities with community safety and fueled discussions around the importance of maintaining secure borders while offering refuge to those in need.
As the show wrapped up, Armstrong reiterated his stance, calling for more transparency and consistency in the government’s policies on migrant placements, vetting, and community safety.
