WATCH as David Lammy CAUGHT Red-Handed LYING to MPs with Completely ‘Made-Up’ Rule Parliament Left in Shock

Things got very tense in the UK Parliament today after Foreign Secretary David Lammy was accused of lying to fellow MPs during a serious discussion about the risk of war involving Iran and the United States.

It started when an MP stood up and asked a direct question: If Iran were to launch a military attack on the United States, what would the UK’s role be under NATO’s Article 5 agreement, which says that if one NATO member is attacked, the others must help? The MP also wanted to know if the UK’s response would change depending on where the attack happened for example, if it was in the Middle East.

But instead of giving a straight and honest answer, David Lammy told the MP to go look at section 213 of the ministerial code — a rulebook that ministers are supposed to follow. At first, it seemed like a normal response. But it didn’t take long before people started to notice something strange.

When the MP checked the ministerial code, he found that there is no section 213. In fact, the version of the code published on November 6, 2024, ends at section 2.7 meaning Mr Lammy had quoted something that doesn’t exist.

The MP brought this back to the House and publicly accused the Foreign Secretary of making up a fake rule to avoid answering a very important question about national defense. He asked the Deputy Speaker why a senior government official would try to dodge responsibility like that and whether Mr Lammy should return to Parliament to explain himself.

The Deputy Speaker replied that he couldn’t speak for government ministers, but agreed that the Foreign Secretary should be given a chance to respond properly. He also reminded everyone that the rules of the House don’t allow the Speaker to punish a minister directly for avoiding questions — but said the MP had made his concerns clear for the record.

This shocking moment has caused a wave of criticism, with many saying that it’s unacceptable for someone in such a powerful position to mislead Parliament — especially about matters of war and national security. People are now demanding that David Lammy come back and tell the truth. Critics say if a minister can’t answer serious questions honestly, the public has every right to lose trust in the government.