Council BANS whites from cushy jobs: UK now woke ‘CAPITAL of the world’ while Trump ends DEI GRIFT

The debate over diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies has taken center stage again after Westminster City Council advertised a job that explicitly excluded white applicants. This comes as America, under President Trump, is moving in the opposite directions crapping DEI departments and instituting merit-based hiring. The stark contrast has sparked heated conversations about whether Britain’s approach is sustainable or if it’s undermining efficiency and fairness.

In the job advert, Westminster City Council sought candidates from a “global majority background” for a role paying £55,000 a year. Critics argue this prioritization of race over merit is divisive and could lead to resentment. GB News panelists were quick to point out that, while local councils are closing public toilets and struggling with basic services, they’re still spending taxpayers’ money on roles many see as unnecessary.

Panelist Mark Littlewood argued that Britain’s obsession with diversity and inclusion is one of the factors behind its decline. “These roles take focus away from what really matters—better policing, healthcare, and efficient councils,” he said. “Meanwhile, in America, Trump has won this debate. DEI is being dismantled because it distracts from productivity and fairness.”

Criticism wasn’t limited to councils. The NHS was also highlighted for advertising diversity manager roles with salaries of up to £100,000—money that could instead fund nurses or doctors. “Patients are being let down because resources are being wasted,” said businessman Adam Brooks. “The best person for the job should get it, regardless of ticking diversity boxes.”

Others noted the growing impact of DEI on public institutions, including the police and military. “Instead of focusing on solving crimes or ensuring national security, we’re seeing endless virtue signaling,” Brooks added. “It’s weakening our institutions.”

However, writer and broadcaster Nina Myskow offered a counterpoint. She argued that DEI policies exist to correct systemic inequalities that have persisted for decades. “When I started working, I was paid two-thirds of what men earned for the same job and couldn’t join the pension scheme. These measures are necessary to level the playing field,” she said.

But even those in favor of DEI policies admitted that the execution can sometimes be flawed. “We need integrated communities where everyone has a fair chance,” Myskow added. “This includes addressing real barriers like language skills and education, not just ticking boxes for diversity hires.”

The panel also delved into broader questions about the fairness and purpose of DEI policies. One controversial topic was whether employers should actively seek to hire individuals from underrepresented backgrounds or focus solely on merit. Littlewood suggested that hiring based on race or ethnicity undermines trust. “If you’re the best candidate for the job, you should get it—no questions asked,” he said. “But when roles are advertised for specific racial groups, it creates doubt.”

The contrast with America was stark. Trump’s recent executive order to eliminate DEI departments and emphasize merit-based hiring has been widely praised by conservatives. “He’s bringing back optimism and common sense,” said Littlewood. “No more quotas, no more box-ticking—just fairness and productivity.”

For some, the debate is as much about symbolism as it is about policy. GB News presenter Patrick Christys noted the messaging difference between the two nations. “Trump is saying, ‘The Golden Age of America awaits,’ while in Britain, we’re tying ourselves in knots over whether saying ‘women have a cervix’ is transphobic. It’s no wonder people feel frustrated.”

Critics also highlighted the practical implications of prioritizing DEI over efficiency. One example discussed was a local council in Wales that closed half its public toilets due to budget constraints but advertised a £45,000-a-year diversity role. “These decisions erode public trust,” said Brooks. “People want to see their taxes spent on services that matter, not on virtue signaling.”

Ultimately, the panel agreed that the focus on diversity should not come at the expense of merit, fairness, or efficiency. “We all want a fair and inclusive society,” Littlewood concluded. “But the current approach isn’t working. It’s time for Britain to grow up, get real, and focus on what actually matters—hiring the best people and delivering results.”

As Westminster City Council defended its recruitment policies as “industry standard” and compliant with UK law, the debate over DEI in Britain continues to heat up. For now, the divide between the UK’s approach and Trump’s America serves as a stark reminder of the different paths nations can take when addressing fairness and equality.