Watch as Reform MP EXPLODES at Keir Stammer “You’ve HUMILIATED the Whole Nation (Video)

Richard Ty rose in the House of Commons with sharp words, thanking the Deputy Speaker before turning his attention to the prime minister. He said Britain has been left humiliated and embarrassed before the world because of the prime minister’s personal choice to appoint Lord Mandlesson as ambassador to the United States.

According to Ty, this is not a simple misstep but a serious lapse in judgment that undermines the credibility of the government. He reminded members that Lord Mandlesson once described himself as the best friend of a convicted pedophile, and even advised that individual during his time in prison, telling him to treat his sentence as an opportunity. Ty said this alone should have disqualified him from holding any office of international trust.

He pressed further on the prime minister’s judgment, noting that before the appointment was made, the prime minister had been handed a two-page document detailing Lord Mandlesson’s troubling links to the pedophile.

Instead of halting the process or questioning the suitability of such a candidate, the prime minister went ahead. Ty said this was not just poor judgment but “woefully incompetent” leadership. He described it as a deliberate act carried out with full knowledge of the facts, which makes the decision even harder to defend.

Ty added that the situation grew worse when new evidence came to light. Last week it became known that a cache of emails existed, raising further questions about Lord Mandlesson’s involvement with the convicted man. As a trained lawyer and barrister, the prime minister should have been the first to ask detailed questions and demand clarity.

Instead, he chose silence. Ty argued that this silence was not just negligence, but a complete failure of responsibility. The role of a lawyer, he reminded the House, is to be thorough and to investigate deeply. Yet in this case, the prime minister showed no interest in what those emails contained, despite knowing they were directly tied to the man he was defending and promoting.

Ty went on to say that the prime minister compounded the matter by coming before Parliament and telling both the House and the public that full due process had been followed in the appointment. That statement, Ty argued, was misleading.

In fact, the proper vetting and checks were carried out only after the decision had already been made and announced to the world. This means the prime minister’s claim and the actual process cannot both be true. According to Ty, the sequence of events proves that the House and the people were not told the full truth.

He concluded by saying that the prime minister had inadvertently misled the country and that the seriousness of this cannot be brushed aside. He insisted the prime minister must return to Parliament, explain in clear terms what he knew, when he knew it, why he pushed through with the decision despite warnings, and why he failed to demand thorough investigation at the proper time.

Ty said the British people deserve clarity and honesty, not evasion. In his view, the issue is not only about Lord Mandlesson but about the prime minister’s willingness to gamble with the reputation and dignity of the nation on the international stage.