The One Big Mistake That’s Destroying Keir Starmer’s Popularity—Here’s What You Need to Know

Since Sir Keir Starmer became Prime Minister in July 2024, his government has struggled to maintain public support. Many are now calling it one of the most unpopular administrations in recent history. 

A recent poll revealed that 61% of people are dissatisfied with Starmer’s performance. Shockingly, even 39% of Labour voters—his own supporters—are unhappy. This highlights the deep disappointment in a government that began with big promises but has failed to meet expectations. 


Instead of solving real issues, Starmer’s government has relied on flashy announcements and policies that seem more about getting attention than achieving real change. This strategy is backfiring, with many people viewing it as shallow and ineffective. 


One major example of this is Starmer’s handling of illegal immigration. During his campaign, he pledged to “smash the gangs” responsible for illegal Channel crossings. However, the problem has only grown worse under his leadership. 

Since Starmer took office, 20,110 migrants have crossed into the UK using small boats. That’s a 78% increase compared to the 11,309 crossings during the first 150 days of Rishi Sunak’s time as Prime Minister. This failure has left many questioning his ability to tackle the issue. 

In response, Starmer introduced a new sanctions policy targeting smuggling networks. This policy allows the government to freeze assets, ban travel, and disrupt the finances of those involved in organized immigration crime. 

While this sounds like a step in the right direction, it’s unlikely to make a real difference. The criminal networks responsible for these crossings operate in countries far outside the UK, such as Turkey, Cambodia, and Thailand. They also use advanced technology like encrypted messaging apps and informal money transfer systems, making them hard to track. 

Many believe this policy is more about creating the appearance of action than addressing the root of the problem. 

Another example of ineffective policymaking is Starmer’s response to violent crime. After a recent tragedy, his government announced plans to restrict the sale of knives online. 

While this may sound like a good idea at first, it doesn’t address the real issue. People can still get knives from their kitchens or stores, and restricting online sales won’t stop violent crime. 

The real problem is the failure of authorities to tackle the root causes of violence. Social issues, poor intervention strategies, and inadequate support systems are driving crime rates up. Instead of addressing these challenges, the government is focusing on surface-level solutions that grab headlines but do little to fix the problem. 

 
When governments lack new ideas, they often rely on policies designed to look good rather than make a difference. Starmer seems to be following this approach, much like the Scottish National Party (SNP) in Scotland. 

The SNP introduced well-known initiatives like free baby boxes, free laptops for students, and the Named Person Scheme. These programs received a lot of media attention but ultimately failed to create meaningful change. They were seen as publicity stunts rather than genuine efforts to improve people’s lives. 

Starmer’s government appears to be taking a similar path, with policies that generate buzz but leave the public feeling let down. 

The frustration with Starmer’s government goes beyond individual policies. Many people feel it lacks a clear vision and strategy. When Labour came to power, it promised competence, reform, and a fresh start. But now, the administration seems lost, jumping from one idea to another in an attempt to win back trust. 


If Keir Starmer wants to save his government’s reputation, he needs to focus on real solutions to the country’s biggest challenges, including immigration, violent crime, and the cost-of-living crisis. The public is losing patience with superficial policies and broken promises. 

Unless Starmer can deliver meaningful change, his time as Prime Minister risks being remembered not for achievements but for wasted opportunities and growing discontent. The clock is ticking for him to turn things around.