Labour is facing accusations of undemocratic behavior after confirming that local elections in parts of England could be delayed until 2027. The decision comes as the party faces falling poll numbers and a surge in support for Reform UK, prompting critics to describe the move as “acting like a third-world dictator.”
Local elections, originally planned for May 2024, are now expected to be postponed in areas including Essex, Hertfordshire, Kent, Lancashire, and Sussex. Labour has justified the decision as part of council “restructuring,” arguing that some councils may cease to exist under new local authority plans. Deputy Labour Leader Angela Rayner said the move was part of a wider devolution strategy to give “power back to communities.”
However, the announcement has been met with sharp criticism. Reform MP Rupert Lowe accused Labour of undermining democracy, stating:
“You don’t give power back to communities by cancelling elections. Labour is simply avoiding accountability.”
The decision comes amid growing political pressure on Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who currently holds an approval rating of -61, one of the worst for a sitting Prime Minister in modern history. Polls also indicate a sharp decline in Labour’s support, while Reform UK has seen a notable rise—gaining seven points since the general election.
Commentators argue on gbnews tv that Labour’s decision to delay the elections may be politically motivated, as Reform UK is expected to perform well in several affected regions. Journalist Carol Malone criticized the move, saying:
“This is what happens in dictatorships. Labour knows they’ll face a monumental defeat at the ballot box, so they’re taking the vote away from the public.”
Labour has claimed the restructuring could save up to £2 billion in public funds, as merging councils reduces administrative costs. However, opponents argue this is a smokescreen for denying residents their democratic rights.
Regions like Croydon, which has already declared bankruptcy, highlight concerns about financial mismanagement. Critics argue that delaying elections prevents local communities from holding their councils accountable. Reform supporters point to rural areas and red-wall constituencies, where frustrations over cost-of-living issues, immigration, and farming policies have driven support away from Labour.
Reform leader Nigel Farage described the delay as “dodgy” and claimed Starmer’s government is desperate to avoid a public backlash. He said:
“If this were Putin cancelling elections, there would be outrage. Labour is terrified of a referendum on their performance.”
Political commentators have noted that while Labour frames this as a technical reorganization, the timing raises questions. Areas affected by the delay, including Essex and Kent, are strongholds where Reform UK has gained momentum.
The move has also reignited concerns about the role of local democracy. Critics argue that delaying elections for up to three years deprives residents of a say in critical decisions, especially as councils face mounting financial pressures.
As Labour defends the decision as a practical necessity, questions remain about the government’s motivations. Critics warn that denying people the chance to vote risks further damaging trust in the democratic process at a time when Starmer’s leadership is already under scrutiny.
