PM SQUIRMS as Minister DEMANDS ‘TRILLIONS’ in Slavery Reparations – Tense Clash Unfolds

The Prime Minister is facing serious questions after shocking new information emerged about his close friend, the Attorney General. It has been revealed that the Attorney General has advised Caribbean nations on how to claim trillions of pounds in reparations from Britain. Many people are now asking why a key figure in the British government would help other countries take legal action that could cost British taxpayers an enormous amount of money.

But that is not the only issue. The Attorney General also played a major role in the handover of the Chagos Islands, a British territory in the Indian Ocean. The decision to give up control of the islands has turned into a huge financial disaster, with reports saying it could cost the UK up to £118 billion. Critics believe the government mishandled the situation and that British taxpayers will now have to pay the price for poor decision-making.

Another major controversy has come to light regarding Gerry Adams, the former Sinn Féin leader. The Attorney General previously gave legal advice to Adams, who is now in a position to claim money from the British government under the Northern Ireland Legacy payments scheme. This scheme deals with compensation related to the Troubles in Northern Ireland, and if Adams and others like him succeed in their claims, it could end up costing Britain £22.7 billion. This has sparked outrage among many, especially those who lost loved ones during the Troubles, as they feel the government should not be paying out large sums of money in such cases.

During a heated debate in Parliament, opposition members demanded answers from the Prime Minister. They wanted to know if he still trusts his close friend, given his past legal work. They also asked whether the Attorney General is truly working in the best interests of the British public or if his actions are causing unnecessary financial harm to taxpayers.

In response, the Prime Minister defended the Attorney General, arguing that in Britain, everyone has the right to legal representation. He explained that just because a lawyer advises a client, it does not mean they personally agree with their actions. This is an important part of the justice system and has always been the case in the UK.

However, he also criticized members of his own party who are now questioning this principle. He warned that if they change the rules, it could lead to serious consequences. For example, victims of serious crimes, including sexual violence, might find themselves being questioned in court by the very person who attacked them. This could happen if lawyers are no longer allowed to represent clients they disagree with.

His comments have divided opinion. Some MPs supported his argument, saying that legal representation is a fundamental right in any fair justice system. But others were not convinced, arguing that the real issue is not about legal rights but about the Attorney General’s judgment. They believe he has been involved in too many decisions that could cost British taxpayers billions and that the Prime Minister needs to take responsibility for his close friend’s actions.

The debate over the Attorney General’s past continues to grow, and pressure is mounting on the Prime Minister to give a clearer answer on where he stands. With so much public money at stake, many believe the government cannot afford to ignore these serious concerns. The controversy is far from over, and it remains to be seen whether the Prime Minister will take any action or continue to stand by his close ally.