Opinions

Keir Starmer doesn’t care about Britain and one key appointment proves it

0views



In a recent speech in Munich, U.S. Vice President Vance pointed out that free speech in the UK is under threat. This is due to strict laws and a justice system that seems influenced by politics, making it harder for people to speak freely. 

One example is the Attorney General (AG), Lord Hermer. He has a history of defending controversial figures, including Shamima Begum (who left the UK to join ISIS), an Al-Qaeda operative, and former Guantanamo Bay detainees. He also represented illegal migrants from the Chagos Islands who wanted to move to the UK and advised Caribbean nations on seeking reparations from Britain. 

In 2023, he even represented Gerry Adams, the former leader of Sinn Féin, who has long been accused of being involved with the IRA in the past (though he denies it). Many believe Hermer’s past legal work shows he is against British interests. 

Lord Hermer supported Keir Starmer’s leadership campaign in 2020, and after Starmer became Labour leader, he appointed Hermer as Attorney General—despite him never having served in Parliament before. This decision raised concerns about favoritism. 

Critics argue that Starmer and Hermer have pushed a left-wing agenda that is harmful to Britain. After the tragic Southport killings, Starmer labeled all protesters as “far-right,” disregarding the principle that people should be considered innocent until proven guilty. While those who rioted should face justice, many peaceful protesters were also arrested simply for expressing their opinions. 

Within days, over a thousand people were arrested, and hundreds were convicted. Some were punished only for what they said online. One example is Peter Lynch, who had no previous criminal record but was sentenced to prison for things he posted online. He later took his own life in prison. 

Another case is that of Tommy Robinson (real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon). He was jailed for showing a film that was ruled defamatory toward a Syrian schoolboy. This was a civil matter, not a criminal one, yet he was treated harshly. Critics argue that his imprisonment was politically motivated. 

Even if you don’t support Robinson, his treatment raises serious concerns about fairness and free speech. Reports suggest that his rights as a prisoner are being violated—he’s being held in solitary confinement “for his own safety.” But today it’s him—tomorrow, it could be anyone. 

The UK has long been known for valuing freedom and justice. If the legal system becomes politically biased, it threatens those values and puts everyone at risk.