Bombshell: Trump Just Blew NATO Apart, Several Members No Longer Have US Protection

President Donald Trump reiterated his stance on NATO during a recent statement, emphasizing that European nations must pay their fair share for defense if they expect U.S. protection. In a video posted on X (formerly Twitter), Trump criticized NATO members for not meeting their financial obligations, saying, “If they don’t pay, I’m not going to defend them.” He added that while he has good relationships with NATO leaders, he doubts they would come to America’s aid if needed.

Trump highlighted that many NATO countries increased their defense spending during his first term after he pressured them to do so, but he believes they still aren’t contributing enough. He called the current arrangement “very unfair,” noting that the U.S. has historically shouldered a disproportionate share of NATO’s costs. “Until I came along, we were paying close to 100 percent of NATO,” Trump said. “We’re paying 100 percent of their military, and they’re screwing us on trade.”

NATO members are expected to spend 2% of their GDP on defense, but Trump has pushed for this target to be raised to 5%. According to data, the U.S. currently spends 3.38% of its GDP on defense, while countries like Poland exceed the 2% mark, spending over 4%. However, several NATO members, including Canada, Italy, and Belgium, fall below the 2% threshold.

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte responded to Trump’s comments by reaffirming the importance of the transatlantic alliance and acknowledging the need for European nations to increase their defense spending. Dutch Admiral Rob Bauer, chair of NATO’s military committee, also stressed that the 2% target should be seen as a minimum, not a ceiling, and that Europe must be prepared to defend itself.

Trump’s remarks have reignited debates about NATO’s future and the balance of responsibilities among its members. While some view his demands as a push for fairness, others worry about the potential strain on the alliance. Trump’s focus on defense spending and trade imbalances continues to shape his foreign policy approach as he seeks to redefine America’s role in global partnerships.